[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a8a5b95e06e2d5d1c04aab8933f25cd07903a3e8.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2025 22:32:50 -0500
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Documentation
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Integrity
<linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe
<jgg@...pe.ca>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: tpm: tpm-security: Demote "Null Primary
Key Certification in Userspace" section
On Wed, 2025-11-05 at 08:57 +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2025 at 09:55:08AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Tue, 2025-11-04 at 20:13 +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> > > The last section heading in TPM security docs is formatted as
> > > title heading instead. As such, it shows up as TPM toctree entry.
> > > Demote it to section heading as appropriate.
> >
> > It's supposed to be a separate heading. It's explaining how to
> > certify your booted kernel rather than describing TPM security
> > within the kernel.
>
> Should I keep the whole section as-is or should I move it to separate
> docs?
Why might it need moving?
Regards,
James
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (266 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists