[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aQtLerZYehQRWdqe@archie.me>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 20:04:58 +0700
From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Documentation <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Integrity <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: tpm: tpm-security: Demote "Null Primary
Key Certification in Userspace" section
On Tue, Nov 04, 2025 at 10:32:50PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2025-11-05 at 08:57 +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 04, 2025 at 09:55:08AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2025-11-04 at 20:13 +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> > > > The last section heading in TPM security docs is formatted as
> > > > title heading instead. As such, it shows up as TPM toctree entry.
> > > > Demote it to section heading as appropriate.
> > >
> > > It's supposed to be a separate heading. It's explaining how to
> > > certify your booted kernel rather than describing TPM security
> > > within the kernel.
> >
> > Should I keep the whole section as-is or should I move it to separate
> > docs?
>
> Why might it need moving?
Just to tidy up toctree then...
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists