linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] regulator: qcomm-labibb: replace use of system_wq with system_percpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAofZF5S=EWc=GS5LXvw25iZBoe7p-c9o4+YvqXjJ7_wR7VjGw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 17:57:51 +0100
From: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, 
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>, Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, 
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, 
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: qcomm-labibb: replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq

Hi Mark,

On Wed, Nov 5, 2025 at 5:26 PM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>[...]
> As with the ASoC stuff I'm really not convinced that this driver cares
> about this being per CPU so we'd be better off just using the unbound
> workqueue.

Sure, I will send the v2 changing this with system_dfl_wq, same for
the other patch.

Thank you!


--

Marco Crivellari

L3 Support Engineer, Technology & Product