linux-kernel - Re: [linux-next20251103] Boot Fail on IBM Power Server

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20251105144506.01ba08c8@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 14:45:06 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@...il.com>
Cc: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@...ux.ibm.com>, Madhavan Srinivasan
 <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next
 Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, linuxppc-dev
 <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-next20251103] Boot Fail on IBM Power Server

Hi all,

On Wed, 05 Nov 2025 07:04:59 +0530 Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Since you must have the previous linux-next tag which was working for
> you - do you think you can git bisect to identify the problem patch
> (which if reverted boots fine?)

You are better off bisecting from Linus' tree (which was SHA
6146a0f1dfae for next-20251103) to the linux-next tag - assuming that
Linus' tree is OK.

Also, please cut down on what you quote in replies.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped