[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <17515e4d-6e3b-4eb9-99eb-840933315d55@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 23:16:27 +0100
From: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@....de>
To: Mario Limonciello <superm1@...nel.org>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
brauner@...nel.org, hansg@...nel.org, ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com
Cc: jack@...e.cz, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] platform/x86: wmi: Prepare for future changes
Am 04.11.25 um 21:52 schrieb Mario Limonciello:
> On 11/4/25 2:45 PM, Armin Wolf wrote:
>> After over a year of reverse engineering, i am finally ready to
>> introduce support for WMI-ACPI marshalling inside the WMI driver core.
> marshaling> Since the resulting patch series is quite large, i am
> planning to
>> submit the necessary patches as three separate patch series.
>>
>> This is supposed to be the first of the three patch series. Its main
>> purpose is to prepare the WMI driver core for the upcoming changes.
>> The first patch fixes an issue inside the nls utf16 to utf8 conversion
>> code, while the next two patches fix some minor issues inside the WMI
>> driver core itself. The last patch finally moves the code of the WMI
>> driver core into a separate repository to allow for future additions
>> without cluttering the main directory.
>
> One question I have here on the patch to move things.
>
> Since Windows on ARM (WoA) laptops are a thing - is this still
> actually x86 specific? I am wondering if this should be moving to a
> different subsystem altogether like ACPI; especially now with this
> impending other large patch series you have on your way.
I know of a few WoA laptops that contain ACPI-WMI devices, meaning this driver is indeed not x86-specific.
However i need to make some changes to the WMI driver core (and actually tests it on a AArch64 VM) first
before moving it out of drivers/platform/x86.
Once i am actually ready for this i would prefer to move the whole stuff to drivers/platform, as drivers/acpi
IMHO is better suited for core ACPI drivers.
Thanks,
Armin Wolf
>>
>> Armin Wolf (4):
>> fs/nls: Fix utf16 to utf8 conversion
>> platform/x86: wmi: Use correct type when populating ACPI objects
>> platform/x86: wmi: Remove extern keyword from prototypes
>> platform/x86: wmi: Move WMI core code into a separate directory
>>
>> Documentation/driver-api/wmi.rst | 2 +-
>> MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
>> drivers/platform/x86/Kconfig | 30 +------------------
>> drivers/platform/x86/Makefile | 2 +-
>> drivers/platform/x86/wmi/Kconfig | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/platform/x86/wmi/Makefile | 8 +++++
>> drivers/platform/x86/{wmi.c => wmi/core.c} | 34 +++++++++++++---------
>> fs/nls/nls_base.c | 16 +++++++---
>> include/linux/wmi.h | 15 ++++------
>> 9 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/wmi/Kconfig
>> create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/wmi/Makefile
>> rename drivers/platform/x86/{wmi.c => wmi/core.c} (98%)
>>
>
> Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello (AMD) <superm1@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists