[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMj1kXHZioMA21NM_Ddg+U0siyxzTkGWjYiY_jUNP=QXvu1jdw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2025 18:50:12 +0100
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Cc: oe-kbuild@...ts.linux.dev, Francesco Pompo <francescopompo2@...il.com>, lkp@...el.com,
oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] efistub/smbios: Add fallback for SMBIOS record lookup
Hi Dan,
On Thu, 6 Nov 2025 at 14:08, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Francesco,
>
> kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
>
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
>
> url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Francesco-Pompo/efistub-smbios-Add-fallback-for-SMBIOS-record-lookup/20251102-081803
> base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/efi/efi.git next
> patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251102001411.108385-1-francescopompo2%40gmail.com
> patch subject: [PATCH] efistub/smbios: Add fallback for SMBIOS record lookup
> config: i386-randconfig-141-20251103 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251104/202511040131.8yGeRa6u-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: clang version 20.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 87f0227cb60147a26a1eeb4fb06e3b505e9c7261)
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> | Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202511040131.8yGeRa6u-lkp@intel.com/
>
> smatch warnings:
> drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/smbios.c:55 verify_ep_int_checksum() error: buffer overflow 'ptr' 5 <= 14
>
> vim +/ptr +55 drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/smbios.c
>
> d45578057224c4 Francesco Pompo 2025-11-02 48 static bool verify_ep_int_checksum(const struct smbios_entry_point *ep)
> d45578057224c4 Francesco Pompo 2025-11-02 49 {
> d45578057224c4 Francesco Pompo 2025-11-02 50 const u8 *ptr = (u8 *)&ep->int_anchor;
> d45578057224c4 Francesco Pompo 2025-11-02 51 u8 sum = 0;
> d45578057224c4 Francesco Pompo 2025-11-02 52 int i;
> d45578057224c4 Francesco Pompo 2025-11-02 53
> d45578057224c4 Francesco Pompo 2025-11-02 54 for (i = 0; i < 15; i++)
> d45578057224c4 Francesco Pompo 2025-11-02 @55 sum += ptr[i];
>
> This loop reads across a bunch of struct members. We would normally
> use a struct_group() to say that all the struct members are grouped
> together.
>
> d45578057224c4 Francesco Pompo 2025-11-02 56
> d45578057224c4 Francesco Pompo 2025-11-02 57 return sum == 0;
> d45578057224c4 Francesco Pompo 2025-11-02 58 }
>
Please report issues against the version of the patch that is actually
in -next, rather than random versions from the mailing list.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists