[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aQ0LtdyI4XzL1yDs@aschofie-mobl2.lan>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2025 12:57:25 -0800
From: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
CC: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, <nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] libnvdimm/labels: Get rid of redundant 'else'
On Wed, Nov 05, 2025 at 07:37:43PM +0100, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> In the snippets like the following
>
> if (...)
> return / goto / break / continue ...;
> else
> ...
>
> the 'else' is redundant. Get rid of it.
The commit msg doesn't explain why the functional change in this
checkpatch cleanup is OK?
It looks like both to_abstraction_guid() and to_abstraction_uuid()
change the behavior for invalid or unexpected enum values. They use
to return &guid_null or &uuid_null, and with this patch they now
return target. That seems to remove our protection against future
enum values or corrupted enum val.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/nvdimm/label.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/label.c b/drivers/nvdimm/label.c
> index 04f4a049599a..b129f3a55a70 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvdimm/label.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/label.c
snip to the abstraction funcs
> @@ -768,20 +768,20 @@ static const guid_t *to_abstraction_guid(enum nvdimm_claim_class claim_class,
> {
> if (claim_class == NVDIMM_CCLASS_BTT)
> return &nvdimm_btt_guid;
> - else if (claim_class == NVDIMM_CCLASS_BTT2)
> + if (claim_class == NVDIMM_CCLASS_BTT2)
> return &nvdimm_btt2_guid;
> - else if (claim_class == NVDIMM_CCLASS_PFN)
> + if (claim_class == NVDIMM_CCLASS_PFN)
> return &nvdimm_pfn_guid;
> - else if (claim_class == NVDIMM_CCLASS_DAX)
> + if (claim_class == NVDIMM_CCLASS_DAX)
> return &nvdimm_dax_guid;
> - else if (claim_class == NVDIMM_CCLASS_UNKNOWN) {
> - /*
> - * If we're modifying a namespace for which we don't
> - * know the claim_class, don't touch the existing guid.
> - */
> - return target;
> - } else
> + if (claim_class == NVDIMM_CCLASS_NONE)
> return &guid_null;
> +
> + /*
> + * If we're modifying a namespace for which we don't
> + * know the claim_class, don't touch the existing guid.
> + */
> + return target;
> }
>
> /* CXL labels store UUIDs instead of GUIDs for the same data */
> @@ -790,20 +790,20 @@ static const uuid_t *to_abstraction_uuid(enum nvdimm_claim_class claim_class,
> {
> if (claim_class == NVDIMM_CCLASS_BTT)
> return &nvdimm_btt_uuid;
> - else if (claim_class == NVDIMM_CCLASS_BTT2)
> + if (claim_class == NVDIMM_CCLASS_BTT2)
> return &nvdimm_btt2_uuid;
> - else if (claim_class == NVDIMM_CCLASS_PFN)
> + if (claim_class == NVDIMM_CCLASS_PFN)
> return &nvdimm_pfn_uuid;
> - else if (claim_class == NVDIMM_CCLASS_DAX)
> + if (claim_class == NVDIMM_CCLASS_DAX)
> return &nvdimm_dax_uuid;
> - else if (claim_class == NVDIMM_CCLASS_UNKNOWN) {
> - /*
> - * If we're modifying a namespace for which we don't
> - * know the claim_class, don't touch the existing uuid.
> - */
> - return target;
> - } else
> + if (claim_class == NVDIMM_CCLASS_NONE)
> return &uuid_null;
> +
> + /*
> + * If we're modifying a namespace for which we don't
> + * know the claim_class, don't touch the existing uuid.
> + */
> + return target;
> }
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists