[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aQ4lU02gPNCO9eXB@fedora>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 08:58:59 -0800
From: "Vishal Moola (Oracle)" <vishal.moola@...il.com>
To: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>
Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@....com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH Resend] mm: Refine __{pgd,p4d,pud,pmd,pte}_alloc_one_*()
about HIGHMEM
On Fri, Nov 07, 2025 at 05:59:22PM +0800, Huacai Chen wrote:
> __{pgd,p4d,pud,pmd,pte}_alloc_one_*() always allocate pages with GFP
> flag GFP_PGTABLE_KERNEL/GFP_PGTABLE_USER. These two macros are defined
> as follows:
>
> #define GFP_PGTABLE_KERNEL (GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO)
> #define GFP_PGTABLE_USER (GFP_PGTABLE_KERNEL | __GFP_ACCOUNT)
>
> There is no __GFP_HIGHMEM in them, so we needn't to clear __GFP_HIGHMEM
> explicitly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>
> ---
I'm not really sure what "Refine ... about HIGHMEM" is supposed to mean.
Might it be clearer to title this something like "Remove unnecessary
highmem in ..."?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists