[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <311e1152.cc3.19a5cff7033.Coremail.zhangsenchuan@eswincomputing.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 14:27:15 +0800 (GMT+08:00)
From: zhangsenchuan <zhangsenchuan@...incomputing.com>
To: "Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@...nel.org>
Cc: "Manivannan Sadhasivam" <manivannan.sadhasivam@....qualcomm.com>,
lpieralisi@...nel.org, kwilczynski@...nel.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
will@...nel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, robh@...nel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 2/3] PCI: qcom: Check for the presence of a device
instead of Link up during suspend
> -----Original Messages-----
> From: "Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@...nel.org>
> Send time:Thursday, 06/11/2025 19:57:16
> To: zhangsenchuan <zhangsenchuan@...incomputing.com>
> Cc: "Manivannan Sadhasivam" <manivannan.sadhasivam@....qualcomm.com>, lpieralisi@...nel.org, kwilczynski@...nel.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com, will@...nel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, robh@...nel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] PCI: qcom: Check for the presence of a device instead of Link up during suspend
>
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2025 at 06:13:05PM +0800, zhangsenchuan wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Messages-----
> > > From: "Manivannan Sadhasivam" <manivannan.sadhasivam@....qualcomm.com>
> > > Send time:Thursday, 06/11/2025 14:13:25
> > > To: lpieralisi@...nel.org, kwilczynski@...nel.org, mani@...nel.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com
> > > Cc: will@...nel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, robh@...nel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, zhangsenchuan@...incomputing.com, "Manivannan Sadhasivam" <manivannan.sadhasivam@....qualcomm.com>
> > > Subject: [PATCH 2/3] PCI: qcom: Check for the presence of a device instead of Link up during suspend
> > >
> > > The suspend handler checks for the PCIe Link up to decide when to turn off
> > > the controller resources. But this check is racy as the PCIe Link can go
> > > down just after this check.
> > >
> > > So use the newly introduced API, pci_root_ports_have_device() that checks
> > > for the presence of a device under any of the Root Ports to replace the
> > > Link up check.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@....qualcomm.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 6 ++++--
> > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> > > index 805edbbfe7eb..b2b89e2e4916 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> > > @@ -2018,6 +2018,7 @@ static int qcom_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > static int qcom_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
> > > {
> > > struct qcom_pcie *pcie;
> > > + struct dw_pcie_rp *pp;
> > > int ret = 0;
> > >
> > > pcie = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > > @@ -2053,8 +2054,9 @@ static int qcom_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
> > > * powerdown state. This will affect the lifetime of the storage devices
> > > * like NVMe.
> > > */
> > > - if (!dw_pcie_link_up(pcie->pci)) {
> > > - qcom_pcie_host_deinit(&pcie->pci->pp);
> > > + pp = &pcie->pci->pp;
> > > + if (!pci_root_ports_have_device(pp->bridge->bus)) {
> >
> > I'm a little confused.
> > The pci_root_ports_have_device function can help check if there is any device
> > available under the Root Ports, if there is a device available, the resource
> > cannot be released, is it also necessary to release resources when entering
> > the L2/L3 state?
> >
>
> It is upto the controller driver to decide. Once the link enters L2/L3, the
> device will be in D3Cold state. So the controller can just disable all PCIe
> resources to save power.
>
> But it is not possible to transition all PCIe devices to D3Cold during suspend,
> for instance NVMe. I'm hoping to fix it too in the coming days.
>
Hi, Manivannan
Thank you for your explanation.
By the way, in v5 patch, I removed the dw_pcie_link_up judgment, and currently
resources are directly released.
At present, i have completed the pcie v5 patch without adding the
pci_root_ports_have_device function. Do I need to wait for you to merge it
before sending the V5 patch?
Kind regards,
Senchuan Zhang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists