[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7fa4fcf9db0bd2e1a8d325ffae9c55eeb9ac41ba.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2025 08:59:50 +0100
From: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, Heiko
Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander
Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] perf test java symbol: Fix a false negative in
symbol regex
On Thu, 2025-11-06 at 18:08 -0800, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2025 at 08:10:27PM +0100, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> > There are a lot of symbols like
> > InterpreterRuntime::resolve_get_put()
> > in the perf report output, so the existing regex unfortunately
> > always
> > matches something. Replace it with a more precise one.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/tests/shell/test_java_symbol.sh | 4 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_java_symbol.sh
> > b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_java_symbol.sh
> > index f36c9321568c5..4c6bc57b87181 100755
> > --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_java_symbol.sh
> > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_java_symbol.sh
> > @@ -55,8 +55,10 @@ fi
> > # Below is an example of the instruction samples reporting:
> > # 8.18% jshell jitted-50116-29.so [.] Interpreter
> > # 0.75% Thread-1 jitted-83602-1670.so [.]
> > jdk.internal.jimage.BasicImageReader.getString(int)
> > +# Look for them, while avoiding false positives from lines like
> > this:
> > +# 0.03% jshell libjvm.so [.]
> > InterpreterRuntime::resolve_get_put(JavaThread*, Bytecodes::Code)
> > perf report --stdio -i "$PERF_INJ_DATA" 2>&1 |
> > - grep -E " +[0-9]+\.[0-9]+% .*
> > (Interpreter|jdk\.internal).*" >/dev/null 2>&1
> > + grep ' jshell .* jitted-.*\.so .*
> > \(Interpreter$\|jdk\.internal\)' &>/dev/null
>
> Maybe 'jshell' part can go away as well.. but it's up to you. :)
>
> Thanks,
> Namhyung
You are right, jdk.internal stuff may appear in Thread-1, as one can
see in the existing example. I will drop jshell from the regex.
[...]
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists