lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251110-unsightly-blah-410539e95a18@spud>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 19:07:24 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt@...log.com>
Cc: linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	jic23@...nel.org, nuno.sa@...log.com, dlechner@...libre.com,
	andy@...nel.org, Michael.Hennerich@...log.com, robh@...nel.org,
	krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, corbet@....net,
	cosmin.tanislav@...log.com, marcelo.schmitt1@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] dt-bindings: iio: adc: Add AD4134

On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 09:45:18AM -0300, Marcelo Schmitt wrote:

> +  adi,control-mode:
> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string
> +    description:
> +      Describes whether the device is wired to an SPI interface or not. The

Can you explain how you don't automagically know this from what bus
you're on?

> +      PIN/SPI pin on the device must be set accordingly, i.e., PIN/SPI must be
> +      set to logic high for SPI Control Mode, low for Pin Control Mode. When
> +      absent, implies the SPI interface configuration.
> +    enum: [ spi-control-mode, pin-control-mode ]
> +    default: spi-control-mode
> +
> +  adi,asrc-mode:
> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string
> +    description:
> +      Asynchronous Sample Rate Converter (ASRC) operation mode control input.
> +      Describes whether the MODE pin is set to a high level (for master mode
> +      operation) or to a low level (for slave mode operation).

I don't really get this one. If this is an input to the device that
controls behaviour (master v slave) why is an option needed too? Clearly
this is not a gpio but it seems like it could be one, in which case you'd
need some sort of asrc-gpios property. Is it not possible to read the
value of this setting out of the device's registers (maybe it's not when
there's no spi interface connected?)?
It's not used in your driver, so I can't look there easily to see what's
going on.

> +    enum: [ high, low ]
> +    default: low

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ