[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b341a3b3-c215-4335-a962-799a64a3c1b7@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 07:40:20 +0100
From: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@....qualcomm.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kwilczynski@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Hanjie Lin <hanjie.lin@...ogic.com>,
Yue Wang <yue.wang@...ogic.com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
Andrew Murray <amurray@...goodpenguin.co.uk>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Krishna Chaitanya Chundru <krishna.chundru@....qualcomm.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/3] dt-bindings: PCI: amlogic: Fix the register
name of the DBI region
On 11/8/25 11:40, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2025 at 02:37:17PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 06, 2025 at 09:30:15AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 03, 2025 at 03:42:58PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Nov 03, 2025 at 10:47:36AM +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>>>>> Hi Mani,
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/1/25 05:29, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
>>>>>> Binding incorrectly specifies the 'DBI' region as 'ELBI'. DBI is a must
>>>>>> have region for DWC controllers as it has the Root Port and controller
>>>>>> specific registers, while ELBI has optional registers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hence, fix the binding. Though this is an ABI break, this change is needed
>>>>>> to accurately describe the PCI memory map.
>>>>>
>>>>> Not fan of this ABI break, the current bindings should be marked as deprecated instead.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Fair enough. Will make it as deprecated.
>>>
>>> The true question is what value was being passed as that item (ELBI)?
>>> Because if this was always DBI - device has DBI there - then what
>>> deprecation would change?
>>
>> Nothing, except not breaking old DTs with the binding check. That's why I
>> decided to remove it in the first place.
>>
>
> Neil, do you still insist on marking the 'elbi' region deprecated than removing
> it?
Not really. if the original definition was wrong, let's fix it.
Neil
>
> - Mani
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists