[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251110012608.764-1-zhangjiao2@cmss.chinamobile.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 09:26:07 +0800
From: zhangjiao2 <zhangjiao2@...s.chinamobile.com>
To: tj@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jiangshanlai@...il.com,
lkml@...il.com,
zhang jiao <zhangjiao2@...s.chinamobile.com>
Subject: [PATCH] workqueue: Remove unused assert_rcu_or_wq_mutex_or_pool_mutex
From: zhang jiao <zhangjiao2@...s.chinamobile.com>
assert_rcu_or_wq_mutex_or_pool_mutex is never referenced in the code.
Just remove it.
Signed-off-by: zhang jiao <zhangjiao2@...s.chinamobile.com>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index c6b79b3675c3..a86889d8218b 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -539,12 +539,6 @@ static void show_one_worker_pool(struct worker_pool *pool);
!lockdep_is_held(&wq_pool_mutex), \
"RCU or wq_pool_mutex should be held")
-#define assert_rcu_or_wq_mutex_or_pool_mutex(wq) \
- RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_any_held() && \
- !lockdep_is_held(&wq->mutex) && \
- !lockdep_is_held(&wq_pool_mutex), \
- "RCU, wq->mutex or wq_pool_mutex should be held")
-
#define for_each_bh_worker_pool(pool, cpu) \
for ((pool) = &per_cpu(bh_worker_pools, cpu)[0]; \
(pool) < &per_cpu(bh_worker_pools, cpu)[NR_STD_WORKER_POOLS]; \
--
2.33.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists