lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202511100941253989454@163.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 09:41:25 +0800
From: "ccc194101@....com" <ccc194101@....com>
To: stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>, 
	"Benjamin Tissoires" <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>, 
	"Alan Swanson" <reiver@...robability.net>
Cc: gregkh <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, 
	linux-usb <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, 
	usb-storage <usb-storage@...ts.one-eyed-alien.net>, 
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	chenchangcheng <chenchangcheng@...inos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: usb-storage: No additional quirks need to be added to the ECD819-SU3 optical drive.



>On Fri, Nov 07, 2025 at 02:10:46PM +0800, ccc194101@....com wrote:
>> From: Chen Changcheng <chenchangcheng@...inos.cn>
>> 
>> The optical drive of ECD819-SU3 has the same vid and pid as INIC-3069,
>> as follows:
>> T:? Bus=02 Lev=02 Prnt=02 Port=01 Cnt=01 Dev#=? 3 Spd=5000 MxCh= 0
>> D:? Ver= 3.00 Cls=00(>ifc ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS= 9 #Cfgs=? 1
>> P:? Vendor=13fd ProdID=3940 Rev= 3.10
>> S:? Manufacturer=HL-DT-ST
>> S:? Product= DVD+-RW GT80N
>> S:? SerialNumber=423349524E4E38303338323439202020
>> C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=80 MxPwr=144mA
>> I:* If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 2 Cls=08(stor.) Sub=02 Prot=50 Driver=usb-storage
>> E:? Ad=83(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS=1024 Ivl=0ms
>> E:? Ad=0a(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS=1024 Ivl=0ms
>> 
>> This will result in the optical drive device also adding
>> the quirks of US_FL_NO_ATA_1X. When performing an erase operation,
>> it will fail, and the reason for the failure is as follows:
>> [? 388.967742] sr 5:0:0:0: [sr0] tag#0 Send: scmd 0x00000000d20c33a7
>> [? 388.967742] sr 5:0:0:0: [sr0] tag#0 CDB: ATA command pass through(12)/Blank a1 11 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>> [? 388.967773] sr 5:0:0:0: [sr0] tag#0 Done: SUCCESS Result: hostbyte=DID_TARGET_FAILURE driverbyte=DRIVER_OK cmd_age=0s
>> [? 388.967773] sr 5:0:0:0: [sr0] tag#0 CDB: ATA command pass through(12)/Blank a1 11 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>> [? 388.967803] sr 5:0:0:0: [sr0] tag#0 Sense Key : Illegal Request [current]
>> [? 388.967803] sr 5:0:0:0: [sr0] tag#0 Add. Sense: Invalid field in cdb
>> [? 388.967803] sr 5:0:0:0: [sr0] tag#0 scsi host busy 1 failed 0
>> [? 388.967803] sr 5:0:0:0: Notifying upper driver of completion (result 8100002)
>> [? 388.967834] sr 5:0:0:0: [sr0] tag#0 0 sectors total, 0 bytes done.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Chen Changcheng <chenchangcheng@...inos.cn>
>> ---
>>? drivers/usb/storage/unusual_uas.h | 6 ++++++
>>? 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_uas.h b/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_uas.h
>> index 1477e31d7763..6d32b787bff8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_uas.h
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_uas.h
>> @@ -97,6 +97,12 @@ UNUSUAL_DEV(0x125f, 0xa94a, 0x0160, 0x0160,
>>? 		USB_SC_DEVICE, USB_PR_DEVICE, NULL,
>>? 		US_FL_NO_ATA_1X),
>>? 
>> +UNUSUAL_DEV(0x13fd, 0x3940, 0x0310, 0x0310,
>> +		"Initio Corporation",
>> +		"external DVD burner ECD819-SU3",
>> +		USB_SC_DEVICE, USB_PR_DEVICE, NULL,
>> +		NULL),
>> +
>>? /* Reported-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com> */
>>? UNUSUAL_DEV(0x13fd, 0x3940, 0x0000, 0x9999,
>>? 		"Initio Corporation",
>
>It's unprecedented to have two quirks with the same VID and PID, where 
>the second augments the first by virtue of its wider range of bcdDevice 
>values.
>
>As explained in commit 89f23d51defc ("uas: Add US_FL_IGNORE_RESIDUE for 
>Initio Corporation INIC-3069"), the original Initio Corporation 
>quirk in unusual_uas.h was added as a copy of the corresponding quirk in 
>unusual_devs.h, which applies only to bcdDevice = 0x0209.? Should we 
>simply limit the existing unusual_uas.h quirk in the same way?
>
>Benjamin and Alan, you two appear to be the people who originally
>reported the need for this uas quirk.? Do you have any objection to 
>changing the bcdDevice range from 0x0000 - 0x9999 to 0x0209 - 0x0209?? 
>Or can you suggest a range that does not include 0x0310?
>
>Alan Stern

Of course, we cannot have two quirks on devices with the same PID and VID. 
However, since we do not have the INIC-3069 USB device here, we cannot
determine how to narrow down the scope. As you suggested,
it would be best to narrow the bcdDevice range to 0x0209 - 0x0209.

Chen Changcheng

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ