linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the vfs-brauner tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20251112215541.049f3ba8@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 21:55:41 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
 <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the vfs-brauner tree

Hi Mateusz,

On Wed, 12 Nov 2025 11:10:59 +0100 Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com> wrote:
>
> That func is a little special and I would argue it should not have
> these documented. Is there a way to exempt it?

Since the function is declared static, it doesn't really need
kernel-doc, so you should start the comment with "/*" instead of "/**".

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped