[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6t3kq42haafazobjbrnmcppg4bhyzfbmkuyld3h2y3rq5xaehr@olnyeve44x5l>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 12:23:43 +0100
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@...il.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@...a.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 05/12] selftests/vsock: do not
unconditionally die if qemu fails
On Sat, Nov 08, 2025 at 08:00:56AM -0800, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
>From: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@...a.com>
>
>If QEMU fails to boot, then set the returncode (via timeout) instead of
>unconditionally dying. This is in preparation for tests that expect QEMU
>to fail to boot. In that case, we just want to know if the boot failed
>or not so we can test the pass/fail criteria, and continue executing the
>next test.
>
>Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
>Signed-off-by: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@...a.com>
>---
> tools/testing/selftests/vsock/vmtest.sh | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
>
>diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vsock/vmtest.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/vsock/vmtest.sh
>index 13b685280a67..6889bdb8a31c 100755
>--- a/tools/testing/selftests/vsock/vmtest.sh
>+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vsock/vmtest.sh
>@@ -236,10 +236,8 @@ vm_start() {
> --append "${KERNEL_CMDLINE}" \
> --rw &> ${logfile} &
>
>- if ! timeout ${WAIT_TOTAL} \
>- bash -c 'while [[ ! -s '"${pidfile}"' ]]; do sleep 1; done; exit 0'; then
>- die "failed to boot VM"
>- fi
>+ timeout "${WAIT_TOTAL}" \
>+ bash -c 'while [[ ! -s '"${pidfile}"' ]]; do sleep 1; done; exit 0'
> }
>
> vm_wait_for_ssh() {
>
>--
>2.47.3
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists