lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7ae9b0c0-c84a-4c2c-b2ee-9252e9c411b0@linux.dev>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 13:45:31 +0000
From: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
 Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
 Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller"
 <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 3/7] ptp: ocp: Refactor
 ptp_ocp_i2c_notifier_call()

On 11/11/2025 16:52, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Refactor ptp_ocp_i2c_notifier_call() to avoid unneeded local variable.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/ptp/ptp_ocp.c | 21 +++++++++------------
>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ptp/ptp_ocp.c b/drivers/ptp/ptp_ocp.c
> index 28243fb1d78f..1dbbca4197bc 100644
> --- a/drivers/ptp/ptp_ocp.c
> +++ b/drivers/ptp/ptp_ocp.c
> @@ -4872,16 +4872,6 @@ ptp_ocp_i2c_notifier_call(struct notifier_block *nb,
>   {
>   	struct device *dev, *child = data;
>   	struct ptp_ocp *bp;
> -	bool add;
> -
> -	switch (action) {
> -	case BUS_NOTIFY_ADD_DEVICE:
> -	case BUS_NOTIFY_DEL_DEVICE:
> -		add = action == BUS_NOTIFY_ADD_DEVICE;
> -		break;
> -	default:
> -		return 0;
> -	}

the reason we've done it is to avoid iterating over devices and do
string comparisons for actions we don't care about. We can still avoid
local variable by changing if condition later in the code, but I'm not
sure this refactor gives any benefits.

>   
>   	if (!i2c_verify_adapter(child))
>   		return 0;
> @@ -4894,10 +4884,17 @@ ptp_ocp_i2c_notifier_call(struct notifier_block *nb,
>   
>   found:
>   	bp = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> -	if (add)
> +
> +	switch (action) {
> +	case BUS_NOTIFY_ADD_DEVICE:
>   		ptp_ocp_symlink(bp, child, "i2c");
> -	else
> +		break;
> +	case BUS_NOTIFY_DEL_DEVICE:
>   		sysfs_remove_link(&bp->dev.kobj, "i2c");
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		return 0;
> +	}
>   
>   	return 0;
>   }


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ