[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <808e68e6-ba0e-4a2d-8b20-8555f53c586f@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 14:10:19 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>
Cc: Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@....com>, Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@....com>,
"andrew+netdev@...n.ch" <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"eric@...int.com" <eric@...int.com>,
"imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/5] net: fec: remove rx_align from
fec_enet_private
> Sorry, I misremembered the value of XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM. it should
> be 256 bytes.
>
> See fec_enet_alloc_rxq_buffers():
>
> phys_addr = page_pool_get_dma_addr(page) + FEC_ENET_XDP_HEADROOM;
> bdp->cbd_bufaddr = cpu_to_fec32(phys_addr);
>
> I will correct it in v2, thanks
So you could add a BUILD_BUG_ON() test which makes sure
FEC_ENET_XDP_HEADROOM gives you the needed alignment. That way it is
both "documented" and enforced. And it costs nothing at runtime.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists