[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86ldkat5jr.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 13:39:52 +0000
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Mark\
Rutland" <mark.rutland@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J.\
Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
"Saravana\
Kannan" <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Sven Peter <sven@...nel.org>,
Janne Grunau
<j@...nau.net>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
James Clark
<james.clark@...aro.org>,
Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@...wei.com>,
"Alexandru\
Elisei" <alexandru.elisei@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 17/26] genirq: Add request_percpu_irq_affinity() helper
On Wed, 12 Nov 2025 18:27:35 +0000,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 20 Oct 2025 13:29:34 +0100
> Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > While it would be nice to simply make request_percpu_irq() take
> > an affinity mask, the churn is likely to be on the irritating side
> > given that most drivers do not give a damn about affinities.
>
> Only 37 instances. I'd have been tempted to do it anyway :)
I'm leaving this as an exercise for people who enjoy cross-subsystem
patch series!
>
> >
> > So take the more innocuous path to provide a helper that parallels
> > request_percpu_irq(), with an affinity as a bonus argument.
> >
> > Yes, request_percpu_irq_affinity() is a bit of a mouthful.
> >
> > Tested-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists