[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aRY_6-xqgMp4-vid@x1>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 17:30:35 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Tycho Andersen <tycho@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Santosh Shukla <santosh.shukla@....com>,
Ananth Narayan <ananth.narayan@....com>,
Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] perf lock contention: Assorted fixes
On Thu, Nov 13, 2025 at 08:57:40AM -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2025 at 8:03 AM Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com> wrote:
> >
> > o Patch 1 resolves a segmentation fault in both "perf lock report"
> > and "perf lock contention".
> > o Patch 2 repairs the perf-lock unit test.
> Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Thanks, tested, reproduced the segfault and the fix for it, applied to
perf-tools,
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists