[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aRZANk3yLBSb8rq2@x1>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 17:31:50 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: Guilherme Amadio <amadio@...too.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf libbfd: Ensure libbfd is initialized prior to use
On Thu, Nov 13, 2025 at 09:03:42AM -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 11:43 PM Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > Multiple threads may be creating and destroying BFD objects in
> > situations like `perf top`. Without appropriate initialization crashes
> > may occur during libbfd's cache management. BFD's locks require
> > recursive mutexes, add support for these.
> >
> > Reported-by: Guilherme Amadio <amadio@...too.org>
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/aQt66zhfxSA80xwt@gentoo.org/
> > Fixes: 95931d9a594d ("perf libbfd: Move libbfd functionality to its own file")
> > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
>
> I'm hoping adding the missing initialization is just obviously
> correct, Guilherme if you could provide a Tested-by it would be great.
Indeed, Guilherme?
I'm now trying to reproduce the problem to then try with the patch,
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists