linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] replace old wq(s), added WQ_PERCPU to alloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <yq1wm3ud5nw.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 21:38:12 -0500
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        Tejun Heo
 <tj@...nel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
        Frederic
 Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
 <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        "James E . J .
 Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
        "Martin K . Petersen"
 <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] replace old wq(s), added WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue


Marco,

> Let's consider a nohz_full system with isolated CPUs:
> wq_unbound_cpumask is set to the housekeeping CPUs, for !WQ_UNBOUND
> the local CPU is selected.

I applied this series and your other applicable workqueue patches to
6.19/scsi-staging. But ugh, that was a lot of work.

Next time, instead of posting individual patches, please prepare one
comprehensive series for the entire subsystem and submit that as a unit
so I don't have to stitch everything together, deal with dupes, etc.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen