linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] replace old wq(s), added WQ_PERCPU to alloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAofZF41Jn7o2KdbwHCHjrspHub-pLdOrs3Dp4JUKUij8MG1eQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 09:55:09 +0100
From: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, 
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>, 
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>, 
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, 
	"James E . J . Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] replace old wq(s), added WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue

On Thu, Nov 13, 2025 at 3:38 AM Martin K. Petersen
<martin.petersen@...cle.com> wrote:
>
>
> Marco,
>
> > Let's consider a nohz_full system with isolated CPUs:
> > wq_unbound_cpumask is set to the housekeeping CPUs, for !WQ_UNBOUND
> > the local CPU is selected.
>
> I applied this series and your other applicable workqueue patches to
> 6.19/scsi-staging. But ugh, that was a lot of work.
>
> Next time, instead of posting individual patches, please prepare one
> comprehensive series for the entire subsystem and submit that as a unit
> so I don't have to stitch everything together, deal with dupes, etc.
>
> --
> Martin K. Petersen

Sure Martin, thank you!


--

Marco Crivellari

L3 Support Engineer, Technology & Product