linux-kernel - Re: mempool_alloc_bulk and various mempool improvements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20251113055225.GA28909@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 06:52:25 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
	Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mempool_alloc_bulk and various mempool improvements

On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 05:34:05PM +0000, Eric Biggers wrote:
> That sounds good to me.  Sorry for the slow review on the
> blk-crypto-fallback changes.

No problem.  I've got enough on my plate myself..

> How about I also take the two fscrypt
> cleanups "fscrypt: pass a real sector_t to
> fscrypt_zeroout_range_inline_crypt" and "fscrypt: keep multiple bios in
> flight in fscrypt_zeroout_range_inline_crypt" through the fscrypt tree
> for 6.19 to get them out of the way?  They don't depend on anything
> else.

Sure.  I'll resend them with the review comments addressed.  I'll also
see if any other of the API cleanups from my experimental branch might
be suitable.