lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3af78904-98ac-4058-9476-2340dbd23708@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 09:08:53 +0900
From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the block tree

On 11/14/25 8:45 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 11/13/25 4:38 PM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> On 11/14/25 8:07 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On 11/13/25 3:04 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> In commit
>>>>
>>>>   7b2038b1b1d4 ("dm: fix zone reset all operation processing")
>>>>
>>>> Fixes tag
>>>>
>>>>   Fixes: db9aed869f34 ("block: introduce disk_report_zone()").
>>>>
>>>> has these problem(s):
>>>>
>>>>   - Target SHA1 does not exist
>>>>
>>>> Maybe you meant
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: fdb9aed869f3 ("block: introduce disk_report_zone()")
>>>
>>> Guys, that's now three funky shas that have never existed in my tree.
>>> Can we please exercise a bit more diligence in actually tagging patches
>>> correctly?
>>
>> My apologies about this. I was careful to take these from a fresh pull of
>> block/for-next but I obviously screwed-up the copy paste, missing the first
>> character.
> 
> Just add something like this to your git config:
> 
> [core]
> 	abbrev = 12
> [pretty] 
> 	fixes = Fixes: %h (\"%s\")
> [alias]
> 	fixes = log -1 --format=fixes
> 
> and then you just do:
> 
> axboe@...ax ~/gi/linux (for-next)> git fixes fdb9aed869f34d776298b3a8197909eb820e4d0d
> Fixes: fdb9aed869f3 ("block: introduce disk_report_zone()")
> 
> and then you're just copying that entire line, making an error much less
> likely. Still won't catch someone using the wrong SHA, but it would've
> prevented your issue at least.

Will do. Thanks.


-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ