[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251114-liedgut-eidesstattlich-8c116178202f@brauner>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 15:23:16 +0100
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To: NeilBrown <neil@...wn.name>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Chris Mason <clm@...com>, David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
Tyler Hicks <code@...icks.com>, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>, Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@...hat.com>,
Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@...cle.com>, Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...nel.org>,
Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>, Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Carlos Maiolino <cem@...nel.org>, John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>,
Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@...il.com>,
Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@...hat.com>, Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>, Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netfs@...ts.linux.dev,
ecryptfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
selinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/15] Create and use APIs to centralise locking for
directory ops
On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 01:24:41PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2025 at 11:18:23AM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> > Following is a new version of this series:
> > - fixed a bug found by syzbot
> > - cleanup suggested by Stephen Smalley
> > - added patch for missing updates in smb/server - thanks Jeff Layton
>
> The codeflow right now is very very gnarly in a lot of places which
> obviously isn't your fault. But start_creating() and end_creating()
> would very naturally lend themselves to be CLASS() guards.
>
> Unrelated: I'm very inclined to slap a patch on top that renames
> start_creating()/end_creating() and start_dirop()/end_dirop() to
> vfs_start_creating()/vfs_end_creating() and
> vfs_start_dirop()/vfs_end_dirop(). After all they are VFS level
> maintained helpers and I try to be consistent with the naming in the
> codebase making it very easy to grep.
@Neil, @Jeff, could you please look at:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs.git/log/?h=vfs.all
and specifically at the merge conflict resolution I did for:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs.git/commit/?h=vfs.all&id=f28c9935f78bffe6fee62f7fb9f6c5af7e30d9b2
and tell me whether it all looks sane?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists