| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <f0440e5a-6c3e-4c31-b9c8-1f5ced9ceeba@ti.com> Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 14:34:41 +0530 From: T Pratham <t-pratham@...com> To: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net> CC: <llvm@...ts.linux.dev>, <oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Manorit Chawdhry <m-chawdhry@...com>, "Kamlesh Gurudasani" <kamlesh@...com>, Shiva Tripathi <s-tripathi1@...com>, "Kavitha Malarvizhi" <k-malarvizhi@...com>, Vishal Mahaveer <vishalm@...com>, <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] crypto: ti - Add support for AES-GCM in DTHEv2 driver On 14/11/25 12:17, kernel test robot wrote: > Hi Pratham, > > kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: > > [auto build test ERROR on herbert-crypto-2.6/master] > [also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.18-rc5] Applied to incorrect tree. The patch depends on [1] which has been merged in cryptodev-2.6/master > [cannot apply to herbert-cryptodev-2.6/master next-20251113] This is maybe due to the first patch in the series, which was already present in the tree? > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): > >>> drivers/crypto/ti/dthev2-aes.c:573:17: error: call to undeclared function 'crypto_alloc_sync_aead'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > 573 | ctx->aead_fb = crypto_alloc_sync_aead(alg_name, 0, > | ^ > drivers/crypto/ti/dthev2-aes.c:573:17: note: did you mean 'crypto_alloc_aead'? > include/crypto/aead.h:181:21: note: 'crypto_alloc_aead' declared here > 181 | struct crypto_aead *crypto_alloc_aead(const char *alg_name, u32 type, u32 mask); > | ^ >>> drivers/crypto/ti/dthev2-aes.c:573:15: error: incompatible integer to pointer conversion assigning to 'struct crypto_sync_aead *' from 'int' [-Wint-conversion] > 573 | ctx->aead_fb = crypto_alloc_sync_aead(alg_name, 0, > | ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > 574 | CRYPTO_ALG_NEED_FALLBACK); > | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >>> drivers/crypto/ti/dthev2-aes.c:588:2: error: call to undeclared function 'crypto_free_sync_aead'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > 588 | crypto_free_sync_aead(ctx->aead_fb); > | ^ > drivers/crypto/ti/dthev2-aes.c:588:2: note: did you mean 'crypto_free_aead'? > include/crypto/aead.h:194:20: note: 'crypto_free_aead' declared here > 194 | static inline void crypto_free_aead(struct crypto_aead *tfm) > | ^ >>> drivers/crypto/ti/dthev2-aes.c:831:2: error: call to undeclared function 'crypto_sync_aead_clear_flags'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > 831 | crypto_sync_aead_clear_flags(ctx->aead_fb, CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MASK); > | ^ > drivers/crypto/ti/dthev2-aes.c:831:2: note: did you mean 'crypto_aead_clear_flags'? > include/crypto/aead.h:298:20: note: 'crypto_aead_clear_flags' declared here > 298 | static inline void crypto_aead_clear_flags(struct crypto_aead *tfm, u32 flags) > | ^ >>> drivers/crypto/ti/dthev2-aes.c:832:2: error: call to undeclared function 'crypto_sync_aead_set_flags'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > 832 | crypto_sync_aead_set_flags(ctx->aead_fb, > | ^ >>> drivers/crypto/ti/dthev2-aes.c:836:9: error: call to undeclared function 'crypto_sync_aead_setkey'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > 836 | return crypto_sync_aead_setkey(ctx->aead_fb, key, keylen); > | ^ > drivers/crypto/ti/dthev2-aes.c:836:9: note: did you mean 'crypto_aead_setkey'? > include/crypto/aead.h:319:5: note: 'crypto_aead_setkey' declared here > 319 | int crypto_aead_setkey(struct crypto_aead *tfm, > | ^ >>> drivers/crypto/ti/dthev2-aes.c:846:9: error: call to undeclared function 'crypto_sync_aead_setauthsize'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > 846 | return crypto_sync_aead_setauthsize(ctx->aead_fb, authsize); > | ^ > drivers/crypto/ti/dthev2-aes.c:846:9: note: did you mean 'crypto_aead_setauthsize'? > include/crypto/aead.h:332:5: note: 'crypto_aead_setauthsize' declared here > 332 | int crypto_aead_setauthsize(struct crypto_aead *tfm, unsigned int authsize); > | ^ >>> drivers/crypto/ti/dthev2-aes.c:854:2: error: call to undeclared function 'SYNC_AEAD_REQUEST_ON_STACK'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > 854 | SYNC_AEAD_REQUEST_ON_STACK(subreq, ctx->aead_fb); > | ^ >>> drivers/crypto/ti/dthev2-aes.c:854:29: error: use of undeclared identifier 'subreq' > 854 | SYNC_AEAD_REQUEST_ON_STACK(subreq, ctx->aead_fb); > | ^~~~~~ > drivers/crypto/ti/dthev2-aes.c:856:28: error: use of undeclared identifier 'subreq' > 856 | aead_request_set_callback(subreq, req->base.flags, > | ^~~~~~ > drivers/crypto/ti/dthev2-aes.c:858:25: error: use of undeclared identifier 'subreq' > 858 | aead_request_set_crypt(subreq, req->src, req->dst, req->cryptlen, req->iv); > | ^~~~~~ > drivers/crypto/ti/dthev2-aes.c:859:22: error: use of undeclared identifier 'subreq' > 859 | aead_request_set_ad(subreq, req->assoclen); > | ^~~~~~ > drivers/crypto/ti/dthev2-aes.c:861:41: error: use of undeclared identifier 'subreq' > 861 | return rctx->enc ? crypto_aead_encrypt(subreq) : > | ^~~~~~ > drivers/crypto/ti/dthev2-aes.c:862:23: error: use of undeclared identifier 'subreq' > 862 | crypto_aead_decrypt(subreq); > | ^~~~~~ > 14 errors generated. > All the errors are due to the patch [1] not being present in the applied tree. It should be fine when applied to cryptodev-2.6/master. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-crypto/20251022171902.724369-2-t-pratham@ti.com/ -- Regards T Pratham <t-pratham@...com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists