[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87seed972b.ffs@tglx>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2025 19:16:28 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Ma Ke <make24@...as.ac.cn>, maz@...nel.org, shawn.guo@...aro.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Ma Ke
<make24@...as.ac.cn>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip: Fix error handling in qcom_mpm_init
On Sun, Nov 16 2025 at 16:16, Ma Ke wrote:
> of_find_device_by_node() increments the reference count but it's never
> decremented, preventing proper device cleanup. Add put_device()
> properly to ensure references released before function return.
>
> Found by code review.
By whom? You sent 7 patches today which touch random parts of the
kernel:
[PATCH] irqchip: Fix error handling in qcom_mpm_init
[PATCH] phy: HiSilicon: Fix error handling in hi3670_pcie_get_resources_from_pcie
[PATCH] ASoC: codecs: wcd937x: Fix error handling in wcd937x codec driver
[PATCH] ASoC: codecs: Fix error handling in pm4125 audio codec driver
[PATCH] powerpc/warp: Fix error handling in pika_dtm_thread
[PATCH] USB: Fix error handling in gadget driver
[PATCH] USB: ohci-nxp: Fix error handling in ohci-hcd-nxp driver
and in all of them you claim to have found them by code review.
Why do I have doubts especially when I look at your email address?
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists