[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20251117004733.14976-1-make24@iscas.ac.cn>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 08:47:33 +0800
From: Ma Ke <make24@...as.ac.cn>
To: tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
make24@...as.ac.cn,
maz@...nel.org,
shawn.guo@...aro.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip: Fix error handling in qcom_mpm_init
On Mon, Nov 17 2025 at 02:16, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 16 2025 at 16:16, Ma Ke wrote:
>
> > of_find_device_by_node() increments the reference count but it's never
> > decremented, preventing proper device cleanup. Add put_device()
> > properly to ensure references released before function return.
> >
> > Found by code review.
>
> By whom? You sent 7 patches today which touch random parts of the
> kernel:
>
> [PATCH] irqchip: Fix error handling in qcom_mpm_init
> [PATCH] phy: HiSilicon: Fix error handling in hi3670_pcie_get_resources_from_pcie
> [PATCH] ASoC: codecs: wcd937x: Fix error handling in wcd937x codec driver
> [PATCH] ASoC: codecs: Fix error handling in pm4125 audio codec driver
> [PATCH] powerpc/warp: Fix error handling in pika_dtm_thread
> [PATCH] USB: Fix error handling in gadget driver
> [PATCH] USB: ohci-nxp: Fix error handling in ohci-hcd-nxp driver
>
> and in all of them you claim to have found them by code review.
>
> Why do I have doubts especially when I look at your email address?
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
Hi,
Thank you for your note. I can confirm these issues were found through
manual audit. I accumulated these findings over time and submitted
them in a single batch during my spare time. This is a good-faith
effort to contribute to the kernel by fixing what I found.
Best regards,
Ma Ke
Powered by blists - more mailing lists