[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <21173068-5b5c-443a-8362-b05df485681c@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 13:35:52 -0800
From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>, David Gow
<davidgow@...gle.com>, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>,
Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
Rae Moar <raemoar63@...il.com>, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rust: allow `clippy::disallowed_names` for doctests
On 11/17/25 1:24 PM, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 10:13 PM John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com> wrote:
>>
>> Is rust-next a rebasing branch? I was going to request a non-empty commit
>> body, in order to make it more immediately clear what this does. Something
>> like:
>>
>> The current set of disallowed names is inherited from clippy's defaults [1],
>> which are "foo", "baz", and "quux". This may be extended via .clipy.toml,
>> which so far has no entries for disallowed names.
>
> What do you mean by "non-empty commit body"? The commit has several
> short paragraphs and mentions the `foo` example (precisely to hint at
> what the lint does).
>
Yikes, I misread one of the replies (way too quickly) and completely
missed the commit body, sorry for that.
thanks,
--
John Hubbard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists