linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom,sa8775p-lpass-lpi-pinctrl: Add SA8775P LPASS pinctrl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7fcf5917-6f22-4d2b-b846-6dbb3ee017c5@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 07:09:18 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Mohammad Rafi Shaik <mohammad.rafi.shaik@....qualcomm.com>,
 Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 kernel@....qualcomm.com, ajay.nandam@....qualcomm.com,
 ravi.hothi@....qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl:
 qcom,sa8775p-lpass-lpi-pinctrl: Add SA8775P LPASS pinctrl

On 16/11/2025 19:09, Mohammad Rafi Shaik wrote:
> 
> 
> On 11/16/2025 10:59 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 16/11/2025 18:16, Mohammad Rafi Shaik wrote:
>>> Add bindings for the pin controller in Low Power Audio SubSystem (LPASS)
>>> of Qualcomm SA8775P SoC.
>>
>>
>> ...
>>
>>> +
>>> +unevaluatedProperties: false
>>> +
>>> +examples:
>>> +  - |
>>> +    #include <dt-bindings/sound/qcom,q6dsp-lpass-ports.h>
>>> +
>>> +    lpass_tlmm: pinctrl@...0000 {
>>> +        compatible = "qcom,sa8775p-lpass-lpi-pinctrl";
>>> +        reg = <0x0 0x03440000 0x0 0x20000>;
>>
>>
>> Are you sure you tested this file? I think this should nicely fail.
>>
> 
> ACK,
> 
> You’re right — DT binding check is failing.
> 
> My DT binding check didn’t catch it because the schema wasn’t updated.

It will fail on every DT schema. Old as well, so nothing to do with
updating it.


Best regards,
Krzysztof