[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ffd107b9-c1f8-4272-9691-6cd59c93beb3@web.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2025 11:19:48 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Sahil Chandna <chandna.sahil@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@...ux.dev>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>, Michal Hocko
<mhocko@...e.com>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>, Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@...edance.com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>, Suren Baghdasaryan
<surenb@...gle.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Wei Xu <weixugc@...gle.com>, Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@...ux.dev>,
Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm/pagewalk: use min() macro instead of manual
ternary
> mm: pagewalk: use min() macro instead of manual ternary expression
How do you think about to avoid the repetition of a patch subject
in the change description?
…
> This was flagged by Coccinelle
> (misc/minmax.cocci) as an opportunity to use min().
Would an other word wrapping be a bit nicer?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.18-rc6#n658
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists