lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <176356623699.2074882.4567136956236420130.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 15:30:36 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: lgirdwood@...il.com, perex@...ex.cz, 
 "jempty.liang" <imntjempty@....com>
Cc: linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: soc-core: Pre-check zero CPU/codec DAIs, handle
 early rtd->dais alloc failure

On Wed, 19 Nov 2025 10:11:16 +0000, jempty.liang wrote:
> This commit adds a pre-check in ASoC to ensure there are non-zero CPU or
> codec DAIs. It also handles early failure of memory allocation for
> rtd->dais by going to the cleanup path, preventing potential issues
> from invalid configurations or out-of-memory situations.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: soc-core: Pre-check zero CPU/codec DAIs, handle early rtd->dais alloc failure
      commit: e2c48498a93404743e0565dcac29450fec02e6a3

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ