linux-kernel - Re: [bpf-next v1 1/5] selftests/bpf: use sockaddr_storage instead of addr_port in cls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8edc1bae-8a28-4d8b-bf52-249bea05537f@linux.dev>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 08:57:47 -0800
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
To: Hoyeon Lee <hoyeon.lee@...e.com>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Eduard Zingerman
 <eddyz87@...il.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
 Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
 Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>,
 John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
 Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
 Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
 linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [bpf-next v1 1/5] selftests/bpf: use sockaddr_storage instead of
 addr_port in cls_redirect test

On 11/18/25 7:09 PM, Hoyeon Lee wrote:
> For the “family” field, agreed. ss_family is sufficient, and the tuple
> wrapper can be removed. If you're okay with that direction, I can drop
> the family field and resend patches 1 and 2 with that cleanup applied.

Please re-spin patch 1 and 2 with the 'struct tuple' cleanup. The 
patch's title should have "PATCH bpf-next v???". Take a look at other 
patches posted in the mailing list.