[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aR4QjtJqfZGN2_jw@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 20:46:38 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Benoît Monin <benoit.monin@...tlin.com>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Jan Dabros <jsd@...ihalf.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Clark Williams <clrkwllms@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>,
Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik.bayouk@...ileye.com>,
Vladimir Kondratiev <vladimir.kondratiev@...ileye.com>,
Dmitry Guzman <dmitry.guzman@...ileye.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] i2c: designware: Use runtime PM macro for
auto-cleanup
On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 04:05:33PM +0100, Benoît Monin wrote:
> Simplify runtime PM handling in i2c_dw_xfer() by using the
> pm_runtime_active_auto_try guard. This adds the proper handling for
> runtime PM resume errors and allows us to get rid of the done_nolock
> label.
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
LGTM and order kept the same, shouldn't regress.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists