[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHmME9rzr8EGkTy3TduTXK45-w1CwEYnRLX=SjkAqo1CTTgVHA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 20:22:57 +0100
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@...erby.net>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
wireguard@...ts.zx2c4.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jordan Rife <jordan@...fe.io>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 04/11] netlink: specs: add specification for wireguard
On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 8:20 PM Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@...erby.net> wrote:
> B) Add a "operations"->"function-prefix" in YAML, only one funtion gets renamed.
>
> wg_get_device_start(), wg_get_device_dump() and wg_get_device_done() keep
> their names, while wg_set_device() gets renamed to wg_set_device_doit().
>
> This compliments the existing "name-prefix" (which is used for the UAPI enum names).
>
> Documentation/netlink/genetlink-legacy.yaml | 6 ++++++
> tools/net/ynl/pyynl/ynl_gen_c.py | 13 +++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> Jason, would option B work for you?
So just wg_set_device() -> wg_set_device_doit()? That seems quite fine
to me. And it's probably a better name, too, given that it corresponds
with device_dump. It makes both of those follow the form "wg_{genl
verb}_{nl verb}". I like it.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists