linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 04/11] netlink: specs: add specification for wireguard

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <36bdb7f1-fb64-44b5-8848-6c3a8d37b88d@fiberby.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 19:47:13 +0000
From: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@...erby.net>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Donald Hunter
 <donald.hunter@...il.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>,
 Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, wireguard@...ts.zx2c4.com,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Jordan Rife <jordan@...fe.io>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 04/11] netlink: specs: add specification for
 wireguard

On 11/19/25 7:22 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 8:20 PM Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@...erby.net> wrote:
>> B) Add a "operations"->"function-prefix" in YAML, only one funtion gets renamed.
>>
>>      wg_get_device_start(), wg_get_device_dump() and wg_get_device_done() keep
>>      their names, while wg_set_device() gets renamed to wg_set_device_doit().
>>
>>      This compliments the existing "name-prefix" (which is used for the UAPI enum names).
>>
>>      Documentation/netlink/genetlink-legacy.yaml |  6 ++++++
>>      tools/net/ynl/pyynl/ynl_gen_c.py            | 13 +++++++++----
>>      2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> Jason, would option B work for you?
> 
> So just wg_set_device() -> wg_set_device_doit()? 

Sorry, no, wg_get_device_dump{,it} too.

Did my test on top of my branch were they are still renamed, so overlooked that rename.