linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 04/11] netlink: specs: add specification for wireguard

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHmME9roZ3EJfqXh1Avf1JZv+V+uGVgwCboZ+rV8M8-XOTA07Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 21:01:32 +0100
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@...erby.net>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>, 
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, 
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, 
	Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, 
	wireguard@...ts.zx2c4.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jordan Rife <jordan@...fe.io>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 04/11] netlink: specs: add specification for wireguard

On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 8:47 PM Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@...erby.net> wrote:
>
> On 11/19/25 7:22 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 8:20 PM Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <ast@...erby.net> wrote:
> >> B) Add a "operations"->"function-prefix" in YAML, only one funtion gets renamed.
> >>
> >>      wg_get_device_start(), wg_get_device_dump() and wg_get_device_done() keep
> >>      their names, while wg_set_device() gets renamed to wg_set_device_doit().
> >>
> >>      This compliments the existing "name-prefix" (which is used for the UAPI enum names).
> >>
> >>      Documentation/netlink/genetlink-legacy.yaml |  6 ++++++
> >>      tools/net/ynl/pyynl/ynl_gen_c.py            | 13 +++++++++----
> >>      2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> Jason, would option B work for you?
> >
> > So just wg_set_device() -> wg_set_device_doit()?
>
> Sorry, no, wg_get_device_dump{,it} too.

Fine by me.