lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqJNOeKViuUwpLf-7RzBDB-EMm35MumJsGZ0deX1cLx3CQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 15:56:33 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>
Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Wadim Egorov <w.egorov@...tec.de>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: ti: Add missing applied DT overlay targets

On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 8:47 AM Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com> wrote:
>
> + wadim who posted something similar:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> On 18/11/25 02:43, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> > It's a requirement that DT overlays be applied at build time in order to
> > validate them as overlays are not validated on their own.
> >
> > Add the missing TI overlays. Some of the TI overlays have the first part
> > needed (a "*-dtbs" variable), but not the second part adding the target to
> > dtb-y/dtb- variable.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@...nel.org>
>
> Look like there is more needed change needed.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251119123216.1481420-1-w.egorov@phytec.de/
>
> Could one of you post the superset patch?

I'll leave it to Wadim.

>
> I have already sent out the PR for v6.19rc1 for TI tree? Is [1] plan to
> be merged for v6.19 cycle, if so I will plan for a follow up PR with
> newer version of this patch.
>
> > ---
> > This will soon be a warning[1].
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251114222759.4181152-1-robh@kernel.org/
>
> BTW, with above patch, make dtbs seems to fail w/o CONFIG_OF_ALL_DTBS=y.
> Is that expected?

Yes. What's in linux-next now is fixed.

Rob

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ