[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aR1uASSp6VWY72kN@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 09:13:05 +0200
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
To: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Graf <graf@...zon.com>,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] test_kho: always print restore status
On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 07:10:45PM +0100, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> Currently the KHO test only prints a message on success, and remains
> silent on failure. This makes it difficult to notice a failing test. A
> failing test is usually more interesting than a successful one.
>
> Always print the test status after attempting restore.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@...nel.org>
> ---
> lib/test_kho.c | 12 +++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/test_kho.c b/lib/test_kho.c
> index 85b60d87a50ad..47de562807955 100644
> --- a/lib/test_kho.c
> +++ b/lib/test_kho.c
> @@ -306,7 +306,6 @@ static int kho_test_restore(phys_addr_t fdt_phys)
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> - pr_info("KHO restore succeeded\n");
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -319,8 +318,15 @@ static int __init kho_test_init(void)
> return 0;
>
> err = kho_retrieve_subtree(KHO_TEST_FDT, &fdt_phys);
> - if (!err)
> - return kho_test_restore(fdt_phys);
> + if (!err) {
> + err = kho_test_restore(fdt_phys);
> + if (err)
> + pr_err("KHO restore failed\n");
> + else
> + pr_info("KHO restore succeeded\n");
> +
> + return err;
> + }
>
> if (err != -ENOENT) {
> pr_warn("failed to retrieve %s FDT: %d\n", KHO_TEST_FDT, err);
>
> base-commit: f0bfdc2b69f5c600b88ee484c01b213712c63d94
> --
> 2.47.3
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists