[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAofZF7sssziBbBnC5YwJMr_K8xFriHkjjo94LH90rC3RT_5GA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 12:19:13 +0100
From: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>
To: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>,
Hans de Goede <hansg@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/surface: acpi-notify: add WQ_PERCPU to
alloc_workqueue users
On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 12:12 PM Ilpo Järvinen
<ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> [...]
> Fine with me, thanks.
>
>
> For those system_wq changes you can follow a similar structure but alter
> it to match what is changed in the other interface.
>
> This seems already okay:
>
> "Replace system_wq with system_percpu_wq, keeping the same behavior."
>
> And again you can drop the old system_wq is kept for a while thing, it's
> irrelevant to those changes as they're no longer using the system_wq.
>
>
> (When sending the update, you can send all three drivers/platform/ changes
> in a single series.)
Perfect, many thanks!
--
Marco Crivellari
L3 Support Engineer, Technology & Product
Powered by blists - more mailing lists