[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAofZF7AbQ12-3DzpN9Ai49VzOHa3VqyfZnXSpfVq7qijO1GRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 14:48:22 +0100
From: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>
To: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>,
Hans de Goede <hansg@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/surface: acpi-notify: add WQ_PERCPU to
alloc_workqueue users
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 12:12 PM Ilpo Järvinen
<ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>[...]
>
> For those system_wq changes you can follow a similar structure but alter
> it to match what is changed in the other interface.
>
> This seems already okay:
>
> "Replace system_wq with system_percpu_wq, keeping the same behavior."
Sorry it's just to check with you before sending a useless series.
Sounds good this, for the 2 system_percpu_wq commit logs?
I don't think there is more to add here, because it is a wq rename.
This patch continues the effort to refactor worqueue APIs, which has begun
with the change introducing new workqueues and a new alloc_workqueue flag:
commit 128ea9f6ccfb ("workqueue: Add system_percpu_wq and system_dfl_wq")
commit 930c2ea566af ("workqueue: Add new WQ_PERCPU flag")
For more details see the Link tag below. Replace system_wq with
system_percpu_wq, keeping the same behavior.
Thanks!
--
Marco Crivellari
L3 Support Engineer, Technology & Product
Powered by blists - more mailing lists