linux-kernel - [PATCH] crypto: hisilicon/qm - fix incorrect judgment in qm_get_complete_eqe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20251120132124.1779549-1-huangchenghai2@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2025 21:21:24 +0800
From: Chenghai Huang <huangchenghai2@...wei.com>
To: <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linuxarm@...neuler.org>, <liulongfang@...wei.com>, <qianweili@...wei.com>,
	<linwenkai6@...ilicon.com>, <wangzhou1@...ilicon.com>
Subject: [PATCH] crypto: hisilicon/qm - fix incorrect judgment in qm_get_complete_eqe_num()

In qm_get_complete_eqe_num(), the function entry has already
checked whether the interrupt is valid, so the interrupt event
can be processed directly. Currently, the interrupt valid bit is
being checked again redundantly, and no interrupt processing is
performed. Therefore, the loop condition should be modified to
directly process the interrupt event, and use do while instead of
the current while loop, because the condition is always satisfied
on the first iteration.

Fixes: f5a332980a68 ("crypto: hisilicon/qm - add the save operation of eqe and aeqe")
Signed-off-by: Chenghai Huang <huangchenghai2@...wei.com>
---
 drivers/crypto/hisilicon/qm.c | 9 ++++-----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/crypto/hisilicon/qm.c b/drivers/crypto/hisilicon/qm.c
index 8533384e3eaa..56bbb46f1877 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/hisilicon/qm.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/hisilicon/qm.c
@@ -991,7 +991,7 @@ static void qm_get_complete_eqe_num(struct hisi_qm *qm)
 		return;
 	poll_data = &qm->poll_data[cqn];
 
-	while (QM_EQE_PHASE(dw0) != qm->status.eqc_phase) {
+	do {
 		poll_data->qp_finish_id[eqe_num] = dw0 & QM_EQE_CQN_MASK;
 		eqe_num++;
 
@@ -1004,11 +1004,10 @@ static void qm_get_complete_eqe_num(struct hisi_qm *qm)
 			qm->status.eq_head++;
 		}
 
-		if (eqe_num == (eq_depth >> 1) - 1)
-			break;
-
 		dw0 = le32_to_cpu(eqe->dw0);
-	}
+		if (QM_EQE_PHASE(dw0) != qm->status.eqc_phase)
+			break;
+	} while (eqe_num < (eq_depth >> 1) - 1);
 
 	poll_data->eqe_num = eqe_num;
 	queue_work(qm->wq, &poll_data->work);
-- 
2.33.0