[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251121232833.GH233636@ziepe.ca>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2025 19:28:33 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Peter Colberg <pcolberg@...hat.com>
Cc: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kwilczynski@...nel.org>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>,
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@...il.com>,
Daniel Almeida <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Dave Ertman <david.m.ertman@...el.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@...dia.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>, Zhi Wang <zhiw@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] rust: pci: add {enable,disable}_sriov(), to control
SR-IOV capability
On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 05:19:07PM -0500, Peter Colberg wrote:
> Add methods to enable and disable the Single Root I/O Virtualization
> (SR-IOV) capability for a PCI device. The wrapped C methods take care
> of validating whether the device is a Physical Function (PF), whether
> SR-IOV is currently disabled (or enabled), and whether the number of
> requested VFs does not exceed the total number of supported VFs.
>
> Suggested-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Colberg <pcolberg@...hat.com>
> ---
> rust/kernel/pci.rs | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/pci.rs b/rust/kernel/pci.rs
> index 814990d386708fe2ac652ccaa674c10a6cf390cb..556a01ed9bc3b1300a3340a3d2383e08ceacbfe5 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/pci.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/pci.rs
> @@ -454,6 +454,36 @@ pub fn set_master(&self) {
> // SAFETY: `self.as_raw` is guaranteed to be a pointer to a valid `struct pci_dev`.
> unsafe { bindings::pci_set_master(self.as_raw()) };
> }
> +
> + /// Enable the Single Root I/O Virtualization (SR-IOV) capability for this device,
> + /// where `nr_virtfn` is number of Virtual Functions (VF) to enable.
> + #[cfg(CONFIG_PCI_IOV)]
> + pub fn enable_sriov(&self, nr_virtfn: i32) -> Result {
> + // SAFETY:
> + // `self.as_raw` returns a valid pointer to a `struct pci_dev`.
> + //
> + // `pci_enable_sriov()` checks that the enable operation is valid:
> + // - the device is a Physical Function (PF),
> + // - SR-IOV is currently disabled, and
> + // - `nr_virtfn` does not exceed the total number of supported VFs.
> + let ret = unsafe { bindings::pci_enable_sriov(self.as_raw(), nr_virtfn) };
> + if ret != 0 {
> + return Err(crate::error::Error::from_errno(ret));
> + }
> + Ok(())
> + }
> +
> + /// Disable the Single Root I/O Virtualization (SR-IOV) capability for this device.
> + #[cfg(CONFIG_PCI_IOV)]
> + pub fn disable_sriov(&self) {
> + // SAFETY:
> + // `self.as_raw` returns a valid pointer to a `struct pci_dev`.
> + //
> + // `pci_disable_sriov()` checks that the disable operation is valid:
> + // - the device is a Physical Function (PF), and
> + // - SR-IOV is currently enabled.
> + unsafe { bindings::pci_disable_sriov(self.as_raw()) };
> + }
Both these functions should only be called on bound devices - the
safety statement should call it out, does the code require it?
Also per my other email SRIOV should be disabled before a driver can
be unbound, this patch should take care of it to not introduce an
dangerous enable_sriov().
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists