linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i2c: i2c-elektor: Allow building on SMP kernels

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+=Fv5R4_kAd4kxq-fR-2grY408FTC0hBkFURAZhgxAtbVrxPg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2025 14:51:46 +0100
From: Magnus Lindholm <linmag7@...il.com>
To: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
Cc: linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, andi.shyti@...nel.org, 
	wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: i2c-elektor: Allow building on SMP kernels

On Sat, Nov 22, 2025 at 2:29 PM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
<glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Magnus,
>
> On Sat, 2025-11-22 at 13:26 +0100, Magnus Lindholm wrote:
> > It the past the i2c-elektor driver has been broken on SMP, as it seems
>
> Typo: s/It/In/ and I think there should be a full stop after "SMP".
>
> > there has since been some fixes/cleanup work to get rid of cli/sti and
>
> s/has/have/
>
> > rely on spinlocks instead (as pointed out by Wolfram Sang). Tested this
>
> The sentence just ends after "instead". I think you meant to say "instead,
> let's allow building the driver on SMP kernels again." or something like
> that.
>

Thanks for quick response and feedback, I'll send out a v2 right away

/Magnus