[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aSR1NxBi9ZYoKhwT@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 17:09:43 +0200
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
To: "David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)" <david@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
James Houghton <jthoughton@...gle.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Nikita Kalyazin <kalyazin@...zon.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] mm: introduce VM_FAULT_UFFD_MINOR fault reason
On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 12:05:18PM +0100, David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) wrote:
> On 11/23/25 11:27, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@...nel.org>
> >
> > When a VMA is registered with userfaulfd in minor mode, its ->fault()
> > method should check if a folio exists in the page cache and if yes
> > ->fault() should call handle_userfault(VM_UFFD_MISSING).
> >
> > Instead of calling handle_userfault() directly from a specific ->fault()
> > implementation introduce new fault reason VM_FAULT_UFFD_MINOR that will
> > notify the core page fault handler that it should call
> > handle_userfaultfd(VM_UFFD_MISSING) to complete a page fault.
> >
> > Replace a call to handle_userfault(VM_UFFD_MISSING) in shmem and use the
> > new VM_FAULT_UFFD_MINOR there instead.
> >
> > Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand (Red Hat) <david@...nel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > include/linux/mm_types.h | 3 +++
> > mm/memory.c | 2 ++
> > mm/shmem.c | 2 +-
> > 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
> > index 90e5790c318f..eb135369940f 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
> > @@ -1523,6 +1523,8 @@ typedef __bitwise unsigned int vm_fault_t;
> > * fsync() to complete (for synchronous page faults
> > * in DAX)
> > * @VM_FAULT_COMPLETED: ->fault completed, meanwhile mmap lock released
> > + * @VM_FAULT_UFFD_MINOR: ->fault did not modify page tables and needs
> > + * handle_userfault(VM_UFFD_MINOR) to complete
> > * @VM_FAULT_HINDEX_MASK: mask HINDEX value
> > *
> > */
> > @@ -1540,6 +1542,7 @@ enum vm_fault_reason {
> > VM_FAULT_DONE_COW = (__force vm_fault_t)0x001000,
> > VM_FAULT_NEEDDSYNC = (__force vm_fault_t)0x002000,
> > VM_FAULT_COMPLETED = (__force vm_fault_t)0x004000,
> > + VM_FAULT_UFFD_MINOR = (__force vm_fault_t)0x008000,
> > VM_FAULT_HINDEX_MASK = (__force vm_fault_t)0x0f0000,
> > };
> > diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> > index b59ae7ce42eb..94acbac8cefb 100644
> > --- a/mm/memory.c
> > +++ b/mm/memory.c
> > @@ -5279,6 +5279,8 @@ static vm_fault_t __do_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> > }
> > ret = vma->vm_ops->fault(vmf);
> > + if (unlikely(ret & VM_FAULT_UFFD_MINOR))
> > + return handle_userfault(vmf, VM_UFFD_MINOR);
>
> If we could define VM_FAULT_UFFD_MINOR to be 0 without USERFAULTFD, we could
> optimize that check out completely on such configs.
It will be a bit ugly, but we can :)
> --
> Cheers
>
> David
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists