linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] Add TUXEDO Elite 14 Gen1 (X1E78100)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1a5d8d8b-a866-4112-a619-11c18547b63a@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 16:09:56 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@...aro.org>,
 Georg Gottleuber <ggo@...edocomputers.com>,
 Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Ettore Chimenti <ettore.chimenti@...aro.org>,
 Srinivas Kandagatla <srini@...nel.org>, stefan.schmidt@...aro.org,
 wse@...edocomputers.com, cs@...edo.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] Add TUXEDO Elite 14 Gen1 (X1E78100)

On 24/11/2025 15:34, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 22, 2025 at 12:15:40PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 22/11/2025 12:00, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
>>> On Sat, Nov 22, 2025 at 11:16:25AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 21/11/2025 15:26, Georg Gottleuber wrote:
>>>>> [...]
>>>>> Initial support for TUXEDO Elite 14 Gen1 laptop. It is based on Qualcomm
>>>>> Snapdragon X Elite SoC (X1E78100).
>>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>>> Because the SoC is now outdated and some functions still do not work as
>>>>> well as customers would expect from the TUXEDO brand, TUXEDO Elite 14 Gen1
>>>>> will not be offered for sale. We would still like to submit our device
>>>>> tree to the mainline kernel and thus contribute to Linux support for a
>>>>> compatible device sold by Medion (SPRCHRGD 14 S1 Elite). At least in
>>>>> Germany, this device was sold in many large stores. (An official press
>>>>> statement will follow on our website.)
>>>>
>>>> For me this is unmergeable, because we do not take stuff which no one
>>>> uses (no one can even use), and I am sad I put effort in reviewing AFTER
>>>> this was known to be cancelled.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I don't think we have any requirement to have a large user base in order
>>> to merge changes. There is already support for plenty of cancelled
>>> products with only a few (if any) remaining users in mainline, e.g.
>>>
>>>  - Snapdragon X Elite Dev Kit (x1e001de-devkit), shipped only to a
>>>    handful of users before cancelled
>>>  - All ChromeOS SC7280 devices (including DTB variants for several
>>>    revisions of pre-production samples), never shipped to anyone
>>>
>>
>> I discuss here the timing primarily and I don't know the timing about them.
>>
>>> There are also plenty of internal reference devices that only a handful
>>> of people have access to (MTP, HDK, CRD etc). What makes these any
>>
>> They are still "maintained" and "offered", even if only for handful
>> (like 3000 EACH variant) people. That's the amount of board of each
>> variant, e.g. MTP8750, and all of them run some sort of Linux, even if
>> downstream. So sorry, but 3000 (or whatever number it is) is not handful.
> 
> Where does 3000 come from? The Bible says 10 people were enough to
> maintain Sodom and Gomorrah. For Herobrine we know that there are very
> few people still using those devices (maybe less than 10), but we still
> keep it. Cheeza was dropped after it was known that the count is exactly
> zero.
> 
>>
>>> different? Ettore has been actively testing and contributing to the port
>>> for the TUXEDO laptop, so if he wants to continue that, I don't think
>>> anything speaks against merging this device tree.
>>
>> I won't be maintaining it, so not my effort in that, but since you speak
>> about that - maintenance is an effort, thus I decide not to spend it on
>> cancelled products.
>>
>>>
>>> In any case, I don't think the time reviewing these changes is wasted:
>>
>> I am happy that you do not find my time wasted, but I disagree on that
>> because knowing this is cancelled, I would probably not care and review
>> products which are not cancelled at this time.
> 
> There still people owning and being happy with those laptops. It's
> Bjorn's and Konrad's time being spent on maintaining those. What's the
> issue?


I think I described my issue very precise. Please read my first reply in
this thread. Joining discussion at the end of it, not reading it and
then asking "what is the issue" is not really encouraging me to discuss
whether this is a problem or not.

Best regards,
Krzysztof