[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251124153750.73833-1-sj@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 07:37:49 -0800
From: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
damon@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 12/12] mm/damon/core: add trace point for damos stat per apply interval
On Mon, 24 Nov 2025 10:15:45 -0500 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Nov 2025 10:43:26 -0800
> SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > --- a/mm/damon/core.c
> > +++ b/mm/damon/core.c
[...]
> I wonder if the above would look better (and still produce good assembly)
> if it was:
[...]
> I have no real preference. I just think keeping the "if ()" statement out
> of the main code as a more aesthetic look. But the above should be
> equivalent in actual functionality.
Thank you for this suggestion, Steve! I'll update this patch as you suggested
in the next version.
Thanks,
SJ
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists