[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251124-terrestrial-mule-of-kindness-d8c4f5@lemur>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 10:38:08 -0500
From: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Ally Heev <allyheev@...il.com>,
Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@...el.com>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND iwlwifi-next] wifi: iwlwifi: mld: remove unused
variable in d3.c
On Sat, Nov 22, 2025 at 03:18:20PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > Best regards,
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
> > iHUEABYKAB0WIQQBFRpOLrIakF7DYvaWPaLUP9d7HAUCaRLyowAKCRCWPaLUP9d7
> > HLG9AQDZmggT93tMLv32pq5myG3e83t12KWON9efOBg//lH4vgD+Ppw3KoTpdYtJ
> > 20VDaWuqUVj9KLqjx9hblfEiB7s9gQw=
> > =A6F+
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> You should switch to patatt instead, not signing emails. We don't use
> that, I think at all, unlike patatt which is being actively checked by
> toolkit (b4).
It's even more curious. The patch was sent with b4, but I'm pretty sure we
wouldn't have put the PGP signature in like that, so I'm curious how that even
happened.
Ally, can you shed some light on that?
-K
Powered by blists - more mailing lists