[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5d6e492ee9194b1125340a66fbd878279286e433.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 21:28:39 +0530
From: ally heev <allyheev@...il.com>
To: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>, Krzysztof
Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@...el.com>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND iwlwifi-next] wifi: iwlwifi: mld: remove unused
variable in d3.c
On Mon, 2025-11-24 at 10:38 -0500, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 22, 2025 at 03:18:20PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > Best regards,
> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > >
> > > iHUEABYKAB0WIQQBFRpOLrIakF7DYvaWPaLUP9d7HAUCaRLyowAKCRCWPaLUP9d7
> > > HLG9AQDZmggT93tMLv32pq5myG3e83t12KWON9efOBg//lH4vgD+Ppw3KoTpdYtJ
> > > 20VDaWuqUVj9KLqjx9hblfEiB7s9gQw=
> > > =A6F+
> > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
> > You should switch to patatt instead, not signing emails. We don't use
> > that, I think at all, unlike patatt which is being actively checked by
> > toolkit (b4).
>
> It's even more curious. The patch was sent with b4, but I'm pretty sure we
> wouldn't have put the PGP signature in like that, so I'm curious how that even
> happened.
>
> Ally, can you shed some light on that?
>
> -K
Yes, I use b4 for my patches. I work on other open source projects
which use Github. So, my global git config commit autosign is set to
`true`, hence you have seen PGP signatures.
I have disabled it locally now
Regards,
Ally
Powered by blists - more mailing lists